Cobots as Care Robots

After several postponements, the symposium „Applied AI in Healthcare: Safety, Community, and the Environment“ will be held within the AAAI Spring Symposia on March 22-23, 2021. One of the presentations is titled „Co-Robots as Care Robots“ (co-robots are also called cobots). The authors of the paper are Oliver Bendel, Alina Gasser, and Joel Siebenmann. From the abstract: „Cooperation and collaboration robots, co-robots or cobots for short, are an integral part of factories. For example, they work closely with the fitters in the automotive sector, and everyone does what they do best. However, the novel robots are not only relevant in production and logistics, but also in the service sector, especially where proximity between them and the users is desired or unavoidable. For decades, individual solutions of a very different kind have been developed in care. Now experts are increasingly relying on co-robots and teaching them the special tasks that are involved in care or therapy. This article presents the advantages, but also the disadvantages of co-robots in care and support, and provides information with regard to human-robot interaction and communication. The article is based on a model that has already been tested in various nursing and retirement homes, namely Lio from F&P Robotics, and uses results from accompanying studies. The authors can show that co-robots are ideal for care and support in many ways. Of course, it is also important to consider a few points in order to guarantee functionality and acceptance.“ More information about the AAAI Spring Symposia is available at aaai.org/Symposia/Spring/sss21.php.

Fig.: Lio in action

AI and Society II

Nach dem Lunch ging es beim Symposium „AI and Society“ am 26. März 2017 um 14.00 Uhr weiter mit der Session „Ethics and Moral Agents“. Umang Bhatt trug vor zum Thema „Maintaining The Humanity of Our Models“. Er ging auf eine Krankheitsdiagnose durch ein KI-System und später auf Obdachlose in L.A. ein und setzte dies in Beziehung zur Bias-Problematik. In „Ethics as Aesthetic for Artificial General Intelligence“ stellte Dan Ventura die Frage: „How can we ensure an AI agent behaves ethically?“ Er schlug den Schönheitssinn als Bestandteil der Metaethik vor. Rafal Rzepka betonte in „Importance of Contextual Knowledge in Artificial Moral Agents Development“, dass Fühlen, Beobachten und Zählen wichtig für moralisches Verhalten seien, wobei das Fühlen nicht die Domäne von Computern sei. Er setzt auf Geschichten als Grundlage für die Entscheidungen der Systeme. Abschließend fand die Discussion Session statt, moderiert von Venerable Tenzin Priyadashi und Judy Wajcman.

Abb.: Unter den Blüten an der Stanford University

Programme of AAAI Spring Symposium

The tentative schedule of AAAI 2018 Spring Symposium on AI and Society at Stanford University (26 – 28 March 2018) has been published. On Tuesday Emma Brunskill from Stanford University, Philip C. Jackson („Toward Beneficial Human-Level AI … and Beyond“) and Andrew Williams („The Potential Social Impact of the Artificial Intelligence Divide“) will give a lecture. Oliver Bendel will have two talks, one on „The Uncanny Return of Physiognomy“ and one on „From GOODBOT to BESTBOT“. From the description on the website: „Artificial Intelligence has become a major player in today’s society and that has inevitably generated a proliferation of thoughts and sentiments on several of the  related issues. Many, for example, have felt the need to voice, in different ways and through different channels, their concerns on: possible undesirable outcomes caused by artificial agents, the morality of their use in specific sectors, such as the military, and the impact they will have on the labor market. The goal of this symposium is to gather a diverse group of researchers from many disciplines and to ignite a scientific discussion on this topic.“ (AAAI website)

Fig.: On the campus of Stanford University